Qt 4.6.0 Beta 1

Posted by Jason McDonald on October 14, 2009 · 13 comments

It was announced at Qt Developer Days in Munich yesterday, but as a long standing Qt tradition states: “The release isn’t out until the Release Manager blogs about it.” So, here it is: Qt 4.6.0 Beta 1 is now ofiicially available.

This release improves on the Tech Prevew 1 release by adding a large number of fixes for bugs and documentation issues, and by finalizing the Gestures API.

The Beta release is available as a source package (there’s just one type of source package now, with .tar.gz and .zip versions that have identical contents), and as pre-built binary packages for Windows, Mac OSX (Carbon and Cocoa), and making its debut with this release, Symbian.

You can get the packages from the Qt website here, or from our ftp site. You can also find the latest documentation at http://qt.nokia.com/doc/4.6-snapshot/index.html.

As with the Tech Preview, we would like constructive feedback on this Beta from the community of users and developers. if you find a bug, you can submit a fix or an autotest that demonstrates the bug via the public qt repository on http://qt.gitorious.org. Alternatively, if you have any bug reports or suggestions, whether they relate to the code, the documentation, or something else Qt-related, just follow the instructions for submitting feedback.

In conjuction with this Beta release, we are launching The Qt Blog, a new site that will include product and roadmap information, details on Qt usage, and other topics that interest the Qt community. The Qt Blog is available now at http://blog.qt.nokia.com.

QShare(this)

Possibly related posts:

  1. Important Update on Qt Mobility 1.1.0 Beta Package
  2. Qt Mobility 1.1.0 – Beta Package
  3. Qt SDK 1.1 beta released

13 comments

1 Thomas October 14, 2009 at 1:56 pm
 

That’s great news for all Mac Users awaiting support for Snow Leopard. However, after installing the Cocoa Package for Mac, the QDbus.framework is not installed completely, also the qdbus tools don’t show up. In the /Developer/Applications/Qt-Folder, the apps Designer, Assistant, etc are missing.

I used the dmg-Package from http://qt.nokia.com/developer/qt-4.6-preview for Cocoa-Release. Actually, the qdbus part was missing in Qt 4.6.0-tp1 too.

2 porfirio October 14, 2009 at 2:08 pm
 

I thought Qt4.6 would be compiled and include gcc4.4 on windows?

3 vohi October 14, 2009 at 2:48 pm
 

@porfirio: upgrading to the gcc 4.4 – based MinGW for the binary package will most likely happen for the release candidate.

4 Chris October 14, 2009 at 5:40 pm
 

Will phonon be included by default on Windows with the release candidate too?

5 Scorp1us October 14, 2009 at 5:57 pm
 

How do we test Phonon on MinGW?

6 King InuYasha October 14, 2009 at 7:48 pm
 

Will Win64 libraries be made available along with MinGW-w64 in the RC?

7 mtz October 15, 2009 at 6:14 am
 

i compile QT from source code and after i choose to go with the open source edition. I told that i am getting the code under LGPL and asked to agree to the term of the license and the installation process quits with “You are not licensed to use this software.” msg when i said no.

You guys have been working with GPL/LGPL code/licences to know by now that a user does not have to agree to these licences to use the code as the license does not take effect at a point of usage, but at a point of (re)distribution

and i am amazed nobody has even brought this up and if has been brought up, you guys are ignoring this crucial difference btw a FOSS license and a proprietary one ..

8 eskil October 15, 2009 at 9:41 am
 

Scorp1us: The DirectShow back-end for Phonon does not compile with MinGW: http://doc.trolltech.com/4.6-snapshot/phonon-overview.html#windows-xp-and-later-windows-versions

9 alexis.menard October 15, 2009 at 11:41 am
 

@mtz : It’s Qt not QT.
How we can know that you accept the license (GPL or LPGL) when you start redistributing… You send us an email saying : “i am going to distribute my app with Qt, and i accept the license”
Btw the LPGL says : “This license, the Lesser General Public License, applies to some specially designated software packages–typically libraries–of the Free Software Foundation and other authors who decide to USE it.” and that’s what we ask for : “You are licensed to USE (…)” so i think it’s perfectly fine.

10 stretchtiberius October 15, 2009 at 6:28 pm
 

I tried the ImageViewer example for gestures using Windows 7 on a Dell Latitude XT2. However, only the PanGesture works. Are the PinchGesture and SwipeGesture supposed to be functional in this beta release? I successfully used pinch with the tech preview but of course a lot has changed.

11 Thiago Macieira October 15, 2009 at 8:08 pm
 

@mtz: you accept the license by starting to use, because you cannot use without accepting a license. We just show you the terms and ask you if you accept them. There’s no harm in doing that and it makes a lot of difference for our Legal department.

12 blabli October 15, 2009 at 9:09 pm
 

Will QtWebkit in Qt 4.6 support HTML 5 Video tag properly (controls and all)? :)

13 King InuYasha October 16, 2009 at 1:49 am
 

@eskil The DShow backend can be compiled in MinGW ( http://labs.trolltech.com/blogs/2009/07/15/phonon-and-mingw-a-story-about-true-windows-love/ )

Comments on this entry are closed.

Previous post:

Next post: